An Evaluation of My Writing :: Teaching Education Essays

An evaluation of My Writing What Dana is insightful. What Danas report hasnt been insightful. So what does this mean? It means, that Dana has been missing from her own physical compositions. She has been absent, and non-existent. Dana has a voice that goes unheard, and she possesses a style which has conformed instead of expanded. Her previous create verbally has epitomized nothingness. It resembles a cosmic soup, void of expression and individuality. There is no doubt that Dana needs to be found, and she should be pictured on the back of milk cartons with the boy MISSING typed in bold letters if necessary, because her writing doesnt give any evidence that she even exists. But wait just a minute Theres been expression that shes just engrossed up a quarter of expository writing, and she could be saved. This is something to be thankful for because the threat of colorless, lifeless, and uninteresting writing might be gone. We should only be satisfaction because one more writer has seen beyond the stem and converted to a style that exceeds that of the formalised Style. Danas earlier work was dry from shekels to finish. Her introductory paragraphs neer grabbed the reader because they started out so slowly. The purpose of her own papers even seemed unclear to her, as if she wasnt completely aware of where she was headed with her thoughts and ideas. Perhaps this is so obvious because what she was writing, was written in such a way, that it didnt even remotely resemble her own communication style. Dana seemed content writing to accommodate the expectations of the person she was writing for, rather than writing to satisfy her own expectations. It was very noticeable, even in the first sentences of her introductory paragraphs, that she purposely tip-toed around issues she could have addressed including the issues in her theme papers. Dana is not the person, style, or voice, that she portrays in her papers. Dana seems to have been taught to believing that wr iting quality is measured by a word choice that is high caliber, eloquent, and sophisticated. I spot this girl, and she doesnt use the humongous two dollar words in her everyday conversations, however, she uses them without discrimination in her writing. Someone, somewhere along the road of her bumpy academic career, has feed her, the very familiar, Official Style myth. It is obvious she gets sick of talking at her readers, attempting to sound like an expert, know-it-all politician.An Evaluation of My Writing Teaching Education EssaysAn Evaluation of My Writing What Dana is insightful. What Danas writing hasnt been insightful. So what does this mean? It means, that Dana has been missing from her own writings. She has been absent, and non-existent. Dana has a voice that goes unheard, and she possesses a style which has conformed instead of expanded. Her previous writing has epitomized nothingness. It resembles a cosmic soup, void of expression and individuality. There is no dou bt that Dana needs to be found, and she should be pictured on the back of milk cartons with the word MISSING typed in bold letters if necessary, because her writing doesnt give any evidence that she even exists. But wait just a minute Theres been word that shes just wrapped up a quarter of expository writing, and she could be saved. This is something to be thankful for because the threat of colorless, lifeless, and uninteresting writing might be gone. We should all be rejoicing because one more writer has seen beyond the theme and converted to a style that exceeds that of the Official Style. Danas earlier work was dry from start to finish. Her introductory paragraphs never grabbed the reader because they started out so slowly. The purpose of her own papers even seemed unclear to her, as if she wasnt completely aware of where she was headed with her thoughts and ideas. Perhaps this is so obvious because what she was writing, was written in such a way, that it didnt even remotely rese mble her own communication style. Dana seemed content writing to accommodate the expectations of the person she was writing for, rather than writing to satisfy her own expectations. It was very noticeable, even in the first sentences of her introductory paragraphs, that she purposely tip-toed around issues she could have addressed including the issues in her theme papers. Dana is not the person, style, or voice, that she portrays in her papers. Dana seems to have been taught to believing that writing quality is measured by a word choice that is high caliber, eloquent, and sophisticated. I know this girl, and she doesnt use the big two dollar words in her everyday conversations, however, she uses them without discrimination in her writing. Someone, somewhere along the road of her bumpy academic career, has fed her, the very familiar, Official Style myth. It is obvious she gets sick of talking at her readers, attempting to sound like an expert, know-it-all politician.