Please write a summary of I BELIVE IN THA HOLY SPIRIT vol. 3 pp Essay

Please write a summary of I BELIVE IN THA HOLY SPIRIT vol. 3 pp. 174-214 written by Yves Congar. I mean only this part fro - Essay Example Anselm decided that the Greeks and Latins were on the same page when it came time to discuss Trinitarian doctrines. Augustine stated that the Greeks believed in one essence and three substances while the Latin people believed in one essence or substance brings three persons. Augustine stated that the difference is only in the wording, however, Abelard believed that this difference was crucial in deciding how well the Greeks practiced their faith. Abelard stated that "hypostasis" was a dangerous word to Jerome. There had been a problem in the way that Greeks followed the doctrines on the Holy Spirit according to the non-Greek religious leaders. These non-Greek religious leaders felt it impossible that the Greeks were genuine when their vocabulary was inappropriate. They believed that the Greeks did not practice in the right way since the vocabulary they used tended to be so radically different, that it was impossible that they followed the right path. The non-Greek religious groups fe lt that this was only a vocabulary issue and that they did still believe in the Holy Spirit in the right way, however, it was too difficult to think that if there is a vocabulary error, there must also be a method in practicing faith error as well. During Anselm's time, it was believed that most of the doctrines were in agreement between the Latin people and the Greeks. Wording seemed to be the only problems encountered by Anselm's opinion of how the Greeks practiced. Thomas believed that the wording was incredibly different but the meanings were almost the same. The Greeks deny the procession of the Holy Spirit a Filio, however they concede it in its antecedent. This problem has lasted since the year 325 and it is now the fourteenth century. This dispute is quite strong still by the fourteenth century and no conclusions have yet been made about whether the Greeks and Latins can come to an agreement of how they practice their faith. Alexander Hales came up with his own opinion and h is comments about how the Latins and Greeks differ are as follows: Augustine (Latin leader at the time) considered the inner structure of the spirit and therefore maintained that it was from the mens that the cogitatio or word proceeded and the latter was followed by the spiration of the affectus. The Damascene (Greek leader at the time), on the other hand, considered the external word so that the point of departure was the intellect, followed by the word, which emerged as a word with a breath, which was connected in an immediate way to the intellect. The spirit, then, was Spiritus Verbi, non a Verbo. Alexander believed that these were the opposing views between the Latins and the Greeks of how the word and the Holy Spirit were related. Bonaventure was a commentator and he came up with an interesting perspective about this controversial debate. The first part is the fact that both the Greeks and the Latins agreed on the aspects of faith in divine revelation found in the scriptures. The second part is concerning the fact that the Greeks and Latins differ in their viewpoints on categories and terminology. The third and final aspect is that of the teaching in a formula which led to the controversy in the first place. He actually figured out where the similarities and differences were and wrote them out to help clear this debate once and for all. The items they both agreed on are as follows: the scriptural basis of the procession and the spirit belongs to the son and is sent by the son. The Latins

Organizational Structure in Coca-Cola Company Assignment

Organizational Structure in Coca-Cola Company - Assignment Example The range of resources here includes human, information, physical and financial. This paper will explore the organizational structure through a case study of Coca-Cola Company as well as endeavor to determine the extent to which the organizational structure is supportive or unsupportive of the company’s goals and suggest possible recommendations for improvement if any. The Coca-Cola Company is the largest beverage company in the world and the leading producer and maker of soft drinks. It is surely a global brand known by anyone because of its popularity through publicity and marketing. The firm in the beverages industry1 whose business idea was first conceived in downtown Atlanta on May 8, 1886, when only one product called the ‘Coca-Cola’, a mix of Coca-Cola syrup and carbonated water, existed. The price of one glass of coke back then was five cents a glass and only 9 drinks were sold per day. Today, the company is more than 126 years old with a client base around the world in more than 200 countries from just one city in one country back then. The company currently estimates the average drink sales per day at about 1.8 billion with more than 500 brands by 2011, four2 of which are the world’s top-five sparkling brands. Coca-Cola has a global presence and became a billion-dollar brand in 2010. It has sponsored world’s sporting events such as the FIFA world cup for more than 80 years. The company has undertaken many social responsibility initiatives including the Haiti Hope Project in 2010, which aimed at developing a sustainable mango industry in Haiti. The company attributes its business success to five main factors which are unique and recognized brand3, quality, marketing, global availability and ongoing innovation.